Stop using the word "I'd"
This is a contraction for 2 different phrases - and it can be difficult to distinguish between them
I discourage using the word "I'd".
This is a contraction for 2 different phrases:
1) I would
2) I had
Depending on the context, they can denote very different things.
1) The phrase "I would read the report" is a hypothetical situation. I have not ACTUALLY read the report yet.
2) The phrase "I had read the report" is a declaration that I did read the report already. (Note that "read" is a past participle in this phrase. It has the same spelling as the present tense, but it is pronounced "red".)
If you write the contractions for these 2 phrases, they would both be "I'd read the report". This is confusing. The same sentence actually has 2 different meanings, depending how you expand that contraction.
There is another disadvantage of using "I'd": Verbally, the "d" sound in "I'd" is difficult to discern, especially if you say it quickly.
Lesson: Don't write or say "I'd". Instead, be explicit and use "I would" or "I had".
If you are reading my posts for the first time: I'm Eric Cai, a statistician based in Toronto, Canada. I write about statistics, communication, and career development for professionals in data & analytics. Subscribe to get my articles delivered to your inbox at 9:30 AM Eastern time on Monday to Friday.
I disagree, I believe that people can understand the context of the situation and not be confused whether you said "I would" or "I had". Nobody gonna say a sentence that would be confusing because of that misconception with context.